Role of Integrity and Care for in Organization

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Suniti Chandiok

Abstract

The purpose is to explore the Role of Integrity and care for in Organization among young adults (25-35 years). The objective of this research work is to know how they incorporate integrity and love towards their organization and to what extent these are important to them for their professional growth. A culture of integrity creates a highly treasured work environment, it impact the quality of commercial governance and it provides a groundwork for solid long-term economic concert. The current conceptualization of integrity, at its core, is the combination of both, consistency in words and actions as well as the adherence to morality and one's values in these actions. Four factors are chosen to get better insight of the above topic. These are as follows: “Integrity”, Love related constructs Self, Trust, Compassion. In the study integrity is considered as a dependent factor and Self, Trust and Compassion as an independent factor. Data collection was collected with the help of structured questionnaire. This research would offer an understanding of the role of integrity and love in organization based on the prevailing factors and eventual outcomes for each factor and would identify the most significant factor. The concept of Integrity and Love in the organizational culture needs to be considered as a significant factor in the overall functioning of an organization to accomplish great results that are effective and efficient workforce, which results in greater productivity and profitability.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Chandiok, S. (2021). Role of Integrity and Care for in Organization. SJCC Management Research Review, 11(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.35737/sjccmrr/v11/i2/2021/133

References

  1. Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994). Macrocultures: Determinants and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19, pp728—755.
  2. Adler, P. S. (2012). Perspective—the sociological ambivalence of bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx. Organization Science, 23, pp244—266.
  3. Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, pp619-644.
  4. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, pp452-471.
  5. Belk, R. W., Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 393-417.
  6. Bowles, M. L. (1993). Logos and eros: The vital syzygy for understanding human relations and organizational action. Human Relations, 46, pp1271—1290.
  7. Camera, W.J, &Schneider, D.L.1995, Questirs of construct breadth and openness of research in integrity testing American Psychologist, 50:459-460.
  8. Collins,JIM & Schmidt, F.L,1993, Personality ,Integrity and white coller crime:A Construct validity study.Personnel Psychology 46, pp295-311.
  9. Colbert, A., Bono, J., Purvanova, R. (2016). Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Academy of Management Journal, 59, pp1199—1223. Published online 13 July 2015.
  10. Gatewood. r.D., & Carroll, A.B.1991. Assessment of ethical performance of organization members:A conceptual framework.Academy of Management Review, 16, pp667-690.
  11. Gompers, Paul A., Ishu, Joy L., & Metrick, Andrew. (2003). Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, pp107-155.
  12. Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test o f a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, pp250—279.
  13. Hazan, C., Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 52, pp5 11-524.
  14. Hazan, C., Shaver, P. R. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 59, pp270—280.
  15. Hoffding,S.(2014).What is skilled coping?Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(910), pp49-73.
  16. Jordan, Brad, Leonard, Shelly, Lyden, Brendan & McDonald, Ryan. (2008) Application Software Industry: Quality of Earnings Analysis. Unpublished paper Jacksonville, Jacksonville University, pp 1-20.
  17. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics The role of integrity, Page 7 CoveyLink Worldwide. (2006). How Do You Measure Trust? Retrieved July 7, 2009 from http://www.coveylink.com/training-and-consulting/consulting-f.php
  18. Locke, E.A & Woiceshyn, J 1995.Why Business should be honest.The argument from rational egoism.Journal of organizational Behaviour, 1 6,pp405-459.
  19. Maslow, A.H. (1962).Lesson from the peak experience.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2(1), pp9-18.
  20. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and leadership: clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25(3), pp171-184.
  21. Quigley, James H. (2007). Trust — An Essential Asset: Creating Individual and Corporate Value,The Raytheon Lectureship in Business Ethics. (Waltham: Bentley College, 2007), pp. 1-24.
  22. Robert Audi & Petrick. E. Murpty, 2006, The many faces of Integrity,Business Ethic Quarterly.vol 16,Jan 2006, pp-3-21.
  23. Smith, C.(1995). A sense of the possible:Miles Davis and the semiotics of improvised performance.TDR, 39(3),pp41-55.
  24. Sutton, J.(2007). Batting, habit and memory:The embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society:Cultures, Commerce,Media Polities, 10(5), pp763-786.
  25. Sutton, J., MclIlwain, D., Christensen, W.,& Geeves, A. (2011).Applying intelligence to the reflexes:embodied skills and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes.Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1) pp78-103.
  26. Thomas.E &Becker 1998,Integrity in organizations beyond honesty and conscientiousness .Academy of Management Review 1998 vol23, pp154-161.